Money
Requests for money, investment pitches, payment routes, promised returns, or financial-account access.
SwipeClue reviews patterns in submitted profile or conversation text. It does not decide who someone is or calculate the probability that a person is fraudulent.
A signal matters because of its language and context. Ordinary dating language alone should not be treated as suspicious.
Requests for money, investment pitches, payment routes, promised returns, or financial-account access.
Avoiding a brief live video call, repeated uncheckable excuses, or resistance to ordinary identity-safety steps.
Urgency, secrecy, isolation, threats, coercion, or attempts to stop outside advice.
Very early platform switching, rapid emotional escalation, scripted phrasing, or inconsistent story details.
No major scripted warning language was detected. This does not verify identity or guarantee safety.
One or more submitted patterns deserve a calm question or independent check before trust increases.
Several serious signals—especially money, coercion, urgency, or verification avoidance—deserve a pause before continuing.
Internal weighting keeps these bands consistent. SwipeClue does not show it as a percentage because that would imply more certainty than text review provides.
AI-assisted review can miss context, misunderstand jokes or cultural phrasing, and generate imperfect explanations. SwipeClue cannot verify identity, conduct a background check, search private records, prove a claim is false, or guarantee safety.
Use the report as decision support. Keep money and financial access out of new romantic relationships, verify important claims independently, use platform safety tools, and involve someone you trust when pressure appears.
Inspect a complete sample before submitting anything.
View the sample report